Friday, August 18, 2006


Pulling Teeth for Gold

Here are a few links to articles of note that I've seen recently:

First, Slate has great piece up on the background of "no knock" warrants as well as the "the most important Supreme Court case you've never heard about" Hudson v. Michigan.. (HT to TalkLeft)

Also, while Glenn Greenwald at Unclaimed Territory is locked up finishing his book, he has a guest post, by Pete Guthier and Hypathia, called "Using the Drug "War" to Expand Government Power." Hmmm. There was an ulterior motive?

Finally, and sickeningly, TalkLeft has post called "Justice Dept. and ATF Sink to New Low" about ATF agents attempting to seize the gold caps from two federally indicted defendant's teeth. An excerpt, from the Seattle Times story:

According to court documents and attorneys involved in the case, Flenard T. Neal Jr. and Donald Jamar Lewis -- who were both charged in U.S. District Court with several counts of drug and weapon violations in January -- on Tuesday were taken from the Federal Detention Center in SeaTac to the U.S. Marshal's Office in Tacoma. There they were told the government had a warrant to seize the grills from their mouths and that they were being taken to a dentist in Seattle for removal.

Both made hasty calls to their attorneys, but were loaded into a vehicle and on their way to Seattle when their attorneys were able to persude a judge to stop the seizure, according to Neal's federal public defender, Miriam Schwartz.

The next time someone asks, "How can you defend those people?" tell them what Richard Troberman, past president of the Washington Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers told the Seattle Times:

"It sounds like Nazi Germany when they were removing the gold teeth from the bodies, but at least then they waited until they were dead."

Another Spying Story

Here is a comment I left at Digby's blog, following an article about the phone records scandal. To me this story is scarier, since it involves a clear violation of the Fourth Amendment, not just a federal statute. Not to diminish the implications of a massive database of civilian phone records in the "Sweet Land of Liberty," but warrantless searches of a lawyer's home should raise a giant red flag, and should not be overlooked despite the rest of the bad news...

Here's what I wrote:

It's hard to keep track of all the evidence of illegal acts, but another story was revealed this week, via Alternet, about an Oregon lawyer whose office and home were searched, shortly after he began representing a person named al-Buthi. You can find the article at

An excerpt:
"A few months [after he started representing al-buthi] Nelson observed inconsistencies when he came to his office: His computer would be left on, disks still in the drive, materials shifted. Fellow lawyers... noticed someone on at least three occasions posing as a janitor, trying to get into the office...
Nelson approached the security people at the building, they wouldn't talk to him.... "There was no direct denial. At the end, I said, 'You probably couldn't tell me if something was going on anyway.' He said, 'That's probably right.'"
After these incidents, Nelson brought the al-Buthi files to his house. That's when he and his wife experienced lapses in his home alarm that the company monitors refused to explain..."

The article describes Nelson as a "close friend" of Brandon Mayfield's, the Oregon lawyer whose fingerprint the FBI claimed to have a "no doubt" match to one found in the Madrid train bombings. The FBI later released Mayfield (after Spanish authorities matched the print to someone else), claiming in court to having made an "honest mistake."

One of the lawyers involved in the case told me Mayfield's children suspected the searches when they saw their alarm clocks blinking (showed power cut off during search) and when they found muddy boot prints on the carpet. On one occasion, one of Mayfield's kids, home sick from school, hid inside his own house while agents roamed around it.

In Mayfield's case, the FBI had a FISA warrant, but the judge refused to allow continued monitoring of Mayfield after his release.

In the case of Mayfield's friend, attorney Thomas Nelson, the article states that "[i]n August 2004, as a routine court procedure, the FBI provided the lawyers and defendants with documents... [but] accidentally released a document that showed the government had used logs of conversations between the lawyers and their clients... to categorize Al-Haramain as a terrorist group. The catch is that the logs were obtained without a warrant."

Like the Bush administration, it appears the FBI decided to ignore that pesky constitution and those meddling judges and spy on attorneys, even in their homes, without a warrant.

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?